What does the ruling on "brain dump" sites say about "boot camps"?

What does the ruling on "brain dump" sites say about "boot camps"? Seems as though if you can get certified in one week's time that you are getting answers to the actual tests. Do you think there is any moral/ethical issue with obtaining a certification this way?
I do not think there are moral or ethical issues involved in going to boot camps, where they do indeed "shamelessly teach to the exams." They do not reproduce questions verbatim, even though they will often come very close. I worry about boot camps for practical reasons: How much of the information that gets crammed into somebody's head in a week or two will they remember two, three or more months later?

That said, most responsible boot camp vendors require attendees to have at least one year's experience with the tools and technologies being taught, so they can concentrate primarily on exam preparation. I would be very worried about entrusting my systems or networks to somebody whose only experience with tools and technologies came from a boot camp; but for those already in the know just trying to get certified, it's not such a big deal. According to boot camp operators I've interviewed, about 75-80% of all attendees there have their costs covered by employers or some other source of funding (scholarship, VA/GI Bill, etc.). That tells me that it's expedient for employers to send their people to boot camps, and probably explains why they remain so popular.

HTH,
--Ed--

This was first published in March 2003

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.