The desire for improved data management and data recovery is driving many IT managers to buy e-mail archiving products. Yet, despite concerns about compliance and litigation, many still do not see e-mail archiving as a priority.
An ongoing online poll conducted by SearchExhange.com asked IT administrators to weigh in on their primary motivation for implementing an e-mail archiving product. Out of almost 100 administrators who responded, 36% said better data management and recovery was the driving factor for purchasing an archiving system.
"We do a lot of our order taking through e-mail, so we need to be able to retrieve information quickly," said Gary DeSando, a systems analyst with Brockway-Smith Company (Brosco), a millwork products distributor based in Andover, Mass. "We're trying to plan for a worst-case scenario."
Other users also want to plan for the future, but their concerns hinge more on the possibility of lawsuits, fines or worse. Citing existing laws, about 16% gave Sarbanes-Oxley or HIPAA as the reason they are putting a message archive system in place. About 18% said litigation concerns had them looking into archive products.
"You can still get in a lot of trouble, even though this stuff isn't very clear," said Mark Diamond, president of Contoural Inc., a data and storage consulting firm in Los Altos, Calif.
|
||||
Yet, despite the implications of failing to comply with legislation, 29% said they currently have no plans to implement an e-mail archiving product. For some, the reason for passing on archive products is simple: Not everyone needs to archive their messages.
"We don't have the statutory requirements," said J. Phillip Miller, a professor and senior member of the IT management department at Washington University in St. Louis. "Now, some people archive e-mail forever and ever, but we don't have to."
Results for the poll are ongoing. Users can weigh in at SearchExchange.com.
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation